Background

This authenticity comes from:

  • Industry associations.
  • Government agencies.
  • And private information sources such as

abuses are reported via, among others:

A vulnerability assessment is executed on the basis of this information, on all of foodstuff in order to assess the of counterfeiting or substituting. This takes into account: 

  • Historical evidence of counterfeiting or substitution;
  • Economic factors that make counterfeiting or substitution attractive;
  • Accessibility to raw materials through the supply chain; 
  • Refinement of routine testing to identify counterfeit resources;
  • Nature of the raw material.

This vulnerability assessment is formally assessed at least annually in order to take into account and process modified economic conditions and market information that could change the possible

If raw materials are identified in this vulnerability assessment as being at special risk of counterfeiting or substitution, appropriate warranty and / or testing processes will be put into place to reduce the risk. 

If are labelled or there are claims made on the end packaging that depend on the status of the raw material, such as:

  • Specific origin or source;
  • Breed / varieties claims;
  • Status of assurance (for , GAP);
  • Genetically modified organism status (GMO);
  • Identity retention;
  • Specific name trademark ingredients.

then the status of each batch of raw material will be checked.

As an organization, we , traceability of use of raw materials and end product packaging with claims. As an organization we are obligated to frequently perform a documented mass balance test with regard to claims. This is carried out and recorded at least every 6 months (in case of the absence of a system certificate) that guarantees product authenticity.

For claims related to the methods of production (for example organic, Beter Leven, halal, kosher), we as an organization must have the necessary certification to be able to make this

The process flow for the product of products with a claim is documented and possible areas for contamination or loss of identity identified. Appropriate are established to ensure product integrity. 

Associated files

Food Vulnerability Assessment.

TwitterFacebookLinkedInPin It

Related articles to Product authenticity, claims and chain assurance

Many customers and visitors to this page 'Product authenticity, claims and chain assurance' also viewed the articles and manuals listed below:

We are a Food Tech firm in Food Safety Compliance. Experts in setting up and maintaining Food Safety Systems for companies in the Food Supply Chain. We are dedicated to breaking down the barriers for Transparency and Trust in the Global Food Supply Chain.
In our Partnership Program we would like to work together with (Non)Governmental Organizations, Universities, Multinationals and Food companies.

iMIS Food is a fully equipped Food Safety Compliance platform. Unique is the installation of an iMIS Food server at the Food company, for online and offline availability. The online (no travel costs) iMIS Food implementation process includes 6 to 10 days of support and has a lead time of 3 months.


Monthly iMIS Food Update

Would you also like to receive the monthly iMIS Food Update and be invited to our events? Then please fill in this form.

Food Safety news 12-2024

Collaboration between QAssurance and Agrea

We partnered with Agrea to expand services to the Philippines, home to one of the largest agri-sectors in Asia, and develop opportunities for Southeast Asia
food fraud

How to Fight Food Fraud – The WTO’s Expert Guide

This article summarizes the WTO's latest report on the impact of food fraud in the food chain outlining strategies to combat it

iMIS Food Mobile: Comply with any mobile device

iMIS Food Mobile is now available on any mobile device. Please contact us, if you would like to know more about iMIS Food mobile and its features.